Safer Tourism Foundation

Big Interview: Cook’s Peter Fankhauser on delivering on promises

by Lee Hayhurst Nov 23rd 2016, 08:00

Thomas Cook chief executive Peter Fankhauser explains why a renewed focus on customer service and differentiated and own-brand hotels is helping the 175-year-old tour operator ‘walk in the flip flops of its customers’. He spoke to Lee Hayhurst

When describing Thomas Cook’s renewed focus on prioritising customer service, chief executive Peter Fankhauser puts a travel twist on a famous saying about empathy.

The 175-year-old company should, he says, “walk in its customers flip-flops” if it is to stay relevant and build on a brand that remains powerful, despite its troubles of recent years.

Speaking ahead of Cook’s full-year trading announcement, Fankhauser says the change he has overseen since taking the helm in 2014 has been the most transformative he’s witnessed in big business.

“It’s about putting our customers at the heart of our heart,” says Fankhauser referring to the ‘sunny heart’ logo brought in by his predecessor Harriet Green.

“We have to care about the customer. We want to be a total service-oriented business and make sure we have that in every aspect of what we do.”

Fankhauser admits the fallout of the deaths of two children from carbon monoxide poisoning on a Thomas Cook holiday in Corfu in 2006 was a chastening experience.

The operator found itself in the middle of a storm of criticism for the way it handled the tragedy after an inquest in May 2015 accused it of breaching its duty 
of care.

Fankhauser, who had been in charge for just seven months, took personal responsibility, issuing what was seen as a long-overdue apology on behalf of Cook.

“Corfu was the trigger point for me to say we cannot go on like that,” he says. “If we were to go on like that we have no meaning, we are losing relevance.

“It’s what a tour operator is all about – it has a duty of care. What is important are the ‘soft facts’ – what values and integrity we have behind our customer promises.

“We had to ask ourselves what did our founder Thomas Cook want to achieve and go back to those founding principles.

“We are a holiday company and we have customers who rely on us. That means you have to walk in the shoes of your customers – you have to wear their flip-flops.”

Central to Fankhauser’s vision has been the decision to assess Cook’s performance using Net Promoter Score (NPS), a widely used method of rating customers’ likelihood to recommend brands from one to ten.

Cook has brought in NPS as a core performance metric in all areas of operations, including retail, on its aircraft and in resorts, and staff are being offered bonuses for improved scores.

Fankhauser says NPS is a method to drive improvement rather than benchmarking against competitors or between markets.

National differences

“You can’t really compare Holland or Germany with the UK because there is a different mentality. The Dutch are disinclined to ever give you a ten, unlike Brits who can be much more energised,” he says.

Health and safety now has a pivotal role in Cook’s strategy. It is working towards annual audits of core hotels from summer 2017, having doubled its in-house headcount and ramped up activity with Geneva-based specialist SGS “to a different level”.

Cook has also reduced the number of properties it offers and started placing a much greater focus on in-house hotel brands in which it can exert greater control over quality and delivery.

This has seen the operator focus on a core portfolio of 3,400 properties – a figure that will eventually fall to 3,000.

Of those, nearly 200 are own-brand hotels, including the new bohemian-style Casa Cook. Outside of the core, Cook has outsourced contracting to Sun Hotels parent Webjet for what it calls its “complimentary” portfolio of 3,000 hotel contracts.

Fankhauser says the Webjet deal gives Cook more control over quality and health and safety because the deal stipulates any properties that do not meet certain standards are dropped.

An Academy of Excellence has been established to help hoteliers meet required standards from food and housekeeping to reception and even online reputation management.

Fankhauser says the success of these initiatives is based on the expectation that “better customer experience leads to better margins”. He points out that the price elasticity on TripAdvisor for a hotel that improves its rating from three to four stars or from four to five is 10%.

“We expect the consumer to be ready to pay for quality. We are also aware that we have to be competitive on the basic price, but then offer additional services.

“The biggest mistake is to think quality is defined by the number of stars a hotel has. Quality is defined by whether you can deliver what you promise.”

Delivery is the ethos behind Cook’s new Hotel Satisfaction Promise, under which guests in certain properties are guaranteed a resolution to their problems.

This summer, the scheme was available in 160 hotels and to 1.4 million customers, who were entitled to 25% off their holiday if Cook failed to address an issue within 24 hours.

Fankhauser takes great pride in pointing out that just 23 customers sought compensation and that destinations and reps are competing to be quickest to respond.

Most have an average resolution time of 11 hours, he says. “If a customer is on holiday, they don’t want compensation, they want to have a great holiday.”

Cook spent last winter training all staff, including product managers, on the promise. This prompted them to be more careful writing product descriptions and to avoid the temptation to “over-promise”.

Fankhauser says Cook’s scale means it can offer product to suit all budgets, ensuring that if post-Brexit economic conditions impact customers’ disposable income they will still be able to afford to go on holiday.

Market clout

And because it is increasingly supplying hotels with mixed nationalities from 15 source markets, it has the clout to guarantee filling beds and negotiate exclusivity from hoteliers.

For Cook’s high-street stores and third-party retail partners, price parity with the web, in place since 2013, has been widely welcomed. Other mainstream rivals have not followed suit claiming, in private, that it is not commercially viable in short-haul beach, but Fankhauser disagrees.

“It works because I find this rebate battle pointless. We are suffering, the hotel is suffering and the retailer is suffering,” he says.

“We are not winning by just reducing the price. If you reduce the price, then you do not get the quality and you do not get the additional earnings. That’s why we have price parity. It’s a win win.”

And Fankhauser says experience of the German market has taught him what happens if you start to undervalue third-party distribution.

“You can make mistakes, but you do not make them twice. We want to grow in all channels; that’s why we are happy with all the support from our third-party agents.”

Join the discussion…

Stephanie Trotter

This sounds wonderful. Prevention of death and injury is so much better for everyone concerned.

The following is extremely encouraging:-
‘Health and safety now has a pivotal role in Cook’s strategy. It is working towards annual audits of core hotels from summer 2017, having doubled its in-house headcount and ramped up activity with Geneva-based specialist SGS “to
a different level”.’

I don’t personally know anything about SGS and will be looking into their expertise in safety issues. For holidaymakers safety topics can be as diverse as gas and carbon monoxide to sensible safety at sea.

The following doesn’t sound quite as good:-
‘An Academy of Excellence has been established to help hoteliers meet required standards from food and housekeeping to reception and even online reputation management.’

We all understand that companies guard their reputations and it is entirely understandable for them do so. However, where is the independent help, advice and support for victims such as the parents of the children who tragically died
in Corfu?

In 2006, on behalf of CO-Gas Safety, I contacted the parents and provided the contact details for the independent gas expert Harry Rogers who undertook the investigation and gave evidence at the inquest. This investigation and evidence was crucial because without Harry’s report, nobody would ever have known just how bad the condition of that gas appliance was. We also recommended Leslie Thomas, the barrister, later QC, for the family at the inquest. In my opinion, without the parents’ determination & courage and the expertise of Harry and Leslie, the full facts would never have emerged.

Last summer at the families’ request, Thomas Cook kindly donated £50,000 to CO-Gas Safety. We are very grateful for that donation. The charity is run almost entirely by volunteers with only a small amount of paid part time help for our data of deaths and injuries. I do all the day to day work as a volunteer. £50,000 sounds a huge amount but our most recent published accounts (2015) show it cost £34,463 to run the charity in 2014-15. We cannot last forever.

Also, what are the other tour operators doing? Surely most people think going with a tour operator means that as at an absolute minimum, the accommodation will be reasonably safe and that someone expert with regard to basic safety such as gas, fire, balcony, pool and hygiene will have inspected the accommodation?

Surely the Federation of Tour Operators should be insisting that there be an independent central body which undertakes safety checks for ALL accommodation as a basic minimum?

If the tour operators got together, then this valuable work could be done more cheaply.

In our opinion the FTO should also be setting up an independent body to provide victim support.

Stephanie Trotter, OBE CO-Gas Safety Email